Drop-in or Drop-out?
How
effective are drop-in centres in deterring criminal activity in
youth? According to the results of joint Swedish-American study,
not very effective at all. In fact, these centres may actually
increase the likelihood that a youth will commit a crime.
The drop-in
centres are part of a national strategy in Sweden devised in the
1960's to provide increased recreational opportunities for youth
and keep them out of dangerous situations. The centres are open
in the evenings for youths 13 to 19, and offer a number of activities,
but with minimal supervision and little or no structure. Instead,
the youths are permitted to explore their interests independently.
The study
followed 498 boys in a medium-sized Swedish community from age
10 to age 30, beginning in 1965 as part of a larger longitudinal
study on Individual Development and Adaptation. At age 10, the
boys were assessed for a number of risk factors, including those
relating to potential for future juvenile and persistent criminal
activity. Over 20 years, the longitudinal study has tracked their
progress in life on a number of fronts.
This particular
study examined the relationship between the youth drop-in centres
and criminal behaviour in youths. Looking at the boys in this
group who frequented the drop-in centres, the researchers found
that the boys with higher risk factors were much more likely to
frequent the drop-in centres than their counterparts with lower
risk factors.
Unfortunately,
this created an unforeseen problem. Boys with an increased tendency
toward antisocial behaviour and criminal activity found themselves
in an unstructured environment with other boys with an increased
tendency toward antisocial behaviour and criminal activity. Instead
of lowering their risk factor through the use of the centre, the
boys who frequented the drop-in centres saw a universal increase
in criminal behaviour.
Why is this?
According to the researchers, "because the youth centres
became available to children at an age when peer influence is
particularly salient, this form of unstructured engagement with
deviant peers may be especially likely to introduce or augment
behaviour patterns of a negative, anti-social sort."
What does
this mean for other drop-in centres, such as those under the Kids
Count banner? Unlike the Swedish models, Kids Count drop-in centres
are structured, with school staff and community volunteers providing
support and leadership. Rather than being given free reign to
do as they please, the youths are presented with stimulating activities
and skill-building opportunities. These activities have included
hip-hop dancing, cooking, art classes, basketball and the creation
of the Gurlz Club. Special events at the drop-in centers have
featured special speakers and manicures by Marvel Beauty. By focusing
the attention of the youths on positive growth exercises, the
Kids Count centres avoid the problems faced by the Swedish centres.
The study,
entitled Youth recreation centre participation and criminal offendng:
A 20-year longitudinal study of Swedish boys, was conducted by
Joesph L. Mahoney of Yale University, Håkan Stattin of Örebro
University in Sweden and David Magnusson of Stockholm University
in Sweden and published in the International Journal of Behavioural
Development.