Ontario's Creative Class
In
the last e-mailer, we introduced you to the ideas of Richard Florida.
This month, we look at Competing on Creativity: Placing Ontario’s
Cities in North American Context, a report prepared for the
Ontario Ministry of Enterprise, Opportunity and Innovation and
the Institute for Competitiveness and Prosperity. Written by Meric
S. Gertler and Richard Florida, Gary Gates and Tara Vinodrai,
the study “examines the relationship between talent, technology,
creativity and diversity in city regions in Ontario – and
Canada more generally – and compares these to the relationships
found to exist in American metropolitan regions.”
The report
built on earlier analyses of American metropolitan areas by Florida
and Gates that found the “social character of city-regions
has a very large influence over their economic success and competitiveness.”
In the past,
natural resources and access to transportation were two key determinants
for economic growth. Today, with a shift to a knowledge-based
economy, skilled workers are the most desirable commodity. Cities
with more knowledge workers are most likely to thrive economically.
The report found that “a vibrant local creative class and
openness to diversity attracts knowledge workers”
The authors
of Competing on Creativity used four indices to analyze and compare
Canada’s 25 largest Census Metropolitan Areas:
- Talent
Index: the proportion of the population over 18 years of age
with a bachelor’s degree or higher.
- Bohemian
Index: the number of people employed in artistic and creative
occupations, including writers, artists, musicians, designers,
etc.
- Mosaic
Index: proportion of the population that is foreign-born.
- Tech-Pole
Index: compares a region’s share of national employment
in high-technology industries to a region’s overall share
of national employment. High-technology industries include:
aircraft, electronic equipment, pharmaceutical, telecommunication,
computers and others.
The overall
results for Canadian cities are encouraging. Compared to similar-sized
cities across in the United States, Canadian cities excelled on
the Bohemian and Mosaic Indices, but were consistently lower on
the talent index. Canada’s “most talented” cities,
Ottawa and Toronto, only placed 10th and 24th respectively amongst
the 43 cities with populations greater than 1,000,000.
The report
suggests two possible reasons for this discovery. The first is
that the lower rankings reflect divergent economic structures
in the two countries. In Ontario especially, the manufacturing
sector employs highly skilled workers who may not have bachelor’s
degrees, and thus are not counted amongst the “talented”
workers.. The second reason is that there generally appears to
be a lower level of educational attainment in Canada.
So, how did
London do?
- London
is Canada’s tenth largest Census Metropolitan Area.
- London’s
Talent Index ranked ninth amongst Canadian cities, above the
national average but well beneath the leaders Ottawa-Hull, Halifax
and Toronto.
- London’s
Bohemian Index was just below the national average of 6.1 persons
per 1000. Vancouver and Toronto held the top two spots with
more than 9 persons per thousand.
- London’s
Mosaic Index is slightly above the national average, though
no city compares to Toronto (more than 40%) or Vancouver (nearly
35%)
- The Tech-Pole
Index saw Montreal (more than 35%), Toronto (more than 30%),
Ottawa-Hull (more than 15%), Vancouver (more than 10%) and Calgary
(nearly 10%) dominate the category, with London amongst a group
of cities with 3% or less of the nation’s high-technology
jobs.
London has
the positive distinction of being “the only city in Ontario
that scores in the top half of the rankings for its size-group
for all four indices. Amongst the 68 North American cities with
populations between 250,000 and 500,000, London fared well in
Talent (28th), Tech-Pole (26th), Bohemian (18th) and Mosaic (6th).
To read the
entire study, download
the PDF file from our website.
In our next
e-mailer, we will look at some of the factors in London that may
be helping or hindering the city’s chances of attracting
the Creative Class.